In early 2011 I went to see the stage production and was completely blown away – it was a masterpiece; a magnificent triumph of British theatre. When I learnt that Spielberg was making a feature-length film, it felt like all my Christmases rolled into one. I spent the last few months counting down the days – like woman waiting for the next Twilight instalment.
Historically and geographically speaking, it was so far off mark it would be like making a film about Bronx gangs and setting it in Sherwood Forest; The architecture of the northern French/Belgian farm houses and villages was about as accurate as depicting Elephant and Castle being full of Bel-Air mansions. During the final battle, that historically took place in August 1918, it began to snow. The screw-picketed barbed wire barriers that are synonymous with the First World War were replaced by rows of log A-frame trestles which looked like something left over from a Vietnam movie. Nazi P.O.W. camp-era watch towers popped up twenty-five years early and apparently the Germans were stupid enough to set up a battery of heavy artillery on the top of a hill. The battlefields and trenches themselves resembled computer game levels and whatever was up with those Disney sunsets…?!
Far-fetched popular clichés of a war that spanned four years were crammed into single scene with some Hollywood icing on top. It reminded me a lot of Ken Annakin’s 1965 film The Battle Of The Bulge which was supposed to be a portrayal of the US Army’s bitter struggle against the German army in 1944-45 in the heavily forested Ardennes forest in Belgium – however the film was made in Spain and the similarities between the location portrayed and the location it was filmed were galaxies apart.
As a history buff with several dozen books on the subject under my belt, I felt that my knowledge of World War One was insulted somewhat and I feel that War Horse offers an unbalanced and disproportionate view of where and how the war was fought on the Western Front. I’m so surprised by Spielberg’s apparent lack of attention to detail following his masterful triumph with HBO series Band Of Brothers. I thought this man could do no wrong when it came to bringing to life these World-changing historic events.
It’s difficult to not want to take anything away from the actual storyline itself, which while being unashamedly fictional unfortunately did display many improbabilities rendering it just another war fantasy with very little scope for believable truth. The screenplay moved at a hundred miles an hour yet pausing to drag out certain scenes that in all honesty I could have used to have a toilet break. The film’s timeline jumped from circa-late 1914 to mid-1918 in a single fade without any real suggestion of the war’s longevity.
I am most disappointed because the film that I thought would be the best war film of the century has, in my opinion, epically failed. The stage production completely and utterly KO’s the film and I can even picture the original book manuscript wiping its own backside with a piece of 35mm reel used during production. Fortunately the acting isn’t quite as bad as the historic inaccuracies so thankfully there’s a bit of salvation there however it’s one DVD I definitely won’t be adding to my collection.
The egg on my face will take a few weeks to clean off since I promised boastfully to my wife that I would go “every night this week” to watch it – of course, that was before I saw it, and one a promise I have no remorse for breaking. Apparently Kate Windsor, the Duchess of Cambridge cried her eyes out at the premier and I don’t blame her – I was on the verge of tears myself…tears of disappointment.
I know it’s a fictional story about a boy and his horse but I just wish now that it hadn’t been associated with World War One having seen how it turned out on the big screen.
My conclusion? Don’t judge a film by its trailer.